Please refer to my video on memberships for the details.

Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCgWpsvtsd6Rqw3i9aMZewRw/join

Let’s assume that there are A and B who have conflicting strategies about the 1 streak pattern on the Big(Main) Road.

A and B only bet after the same hand appears 5 times in a row.

A always bets on the opposite hand because he expects the end of the 1 streak pattern.

However, B always starts to keep betting on the same hand consecutively because he expects that pattern to continue.

What if both of them encounter the 1 streak pattern consisting of 5 same hands 100 times?

Both A and B might be below half of the initial bankroll. The casino would be the only winner, thanks to the Banker commission.

Other pairs of conflicting strategies could have similar results too.

More examples:
A: betting on the opposite hand whenever 2 same hands appear in a row
B: betting on the same hand whenever 2 same hands appear in a row

A: betting on the opposite hand whenever 3 same hands appear in a row
B: betting on the same hand whenever 3 same hands appear in a row

A: betting on the opposite hand whenever Player and Banker appear in turn
B: betting on the same hand whenever Player and Banker appear in turn

A: betting on the opposite hand whenever columns consisting of 2 or more same hands end
B: betting on the same hand whenever columns consisting of 2 or more same hands end

A: betting on the opposite hand of the 1st hand continuously from beginning to end of Shoe
B: betting on the same hand of the 1st hand continuously from beginning to end of Shoe

A: betting on Player continuously from beginning to end of Shoe
B: betting on Banker continuously from beginning to end of Shoe

Some of you may have tried or come up with similar tests. You don’t need to waste your time on this anymore. Instead, you may a little bit pay attention to my experience.

What I discovered after all these attempts was a new possibility. I ceased to consecutive bets. And I added numerous variables and extended the scope of thought until the Derived Roads.

Finally, I found far more precise signals combined by each Road on the Scoreboard and accumulated big data.

And now I summon A and B in my head whenever I decide whether to bet or not. They, on each side, always inform me of the simulated results from big data.

I’m trying to prove that Baccarat is a big data game, and there are a lot of viable skills in this game.